Improve Medicaid risk adjustment accuracy

For those providing health care in the ever-changing landscape of managed Medicaid markets, there are many challenges such as:

• Risk adjustment models and timing vary from state to state. This makes it hard for managed care organizations (MCO) managing multiple plans to run a risk adjustment program across multiple states.
• Seventy-eight percent of states carry risk-bearing contracts with MCOs. Thirty-nine states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico use one of six different Medicaid risk adjustment models for MCO reimbursement.
• State budgets limit the pool of funds distributed among the small set of health plans.
  
• Medicaid providers struggle with access to timely patient data. They don’t have a member’s full medical history so it’s difficult to know if a member has existing health conditions that need assessment.
• Medicaid populations are unique. They can enroll and disenroll at any time, are typically low engagers with their providers and often may not know they have a health condition until very sick.

Differences between Medicare Advantage reimbursement and Medicaid reimbursement

Whether Medicare or Medicaid, risk adjustment programs reimburse health plans for the risk of beneficiaries they enroll. Risk adjustment programs help health plans balance costs by accurately identifying health status and associated costs for each member. This is where the similarities end.

Benefits of accurate condition documentation

Documenting the health status of Medicaid populations accurately is very important to your risk adjustment program. Narrow margins associated with managed Medicaid plans can make the difference between profit and loss.

Those margins can be affected directly by the accuracy of your risk adjustment practices. Because states base risk scores off claims, reimbursement you receive will be only as good as the claims you submit.

Three actions that may improve Medicaid risk adjustment accuracy

The following actions may help maximize the potential of your risk adjustment efforts to represent your population’s health status accurately. This may help improve health outcomes and close gaps in care:

1. Empower providers with timely, actionable data at the point of care. This may help ensure that a member is fully assessed for undiagnosed health conditions. It is important for providers to document and code diagnoses accurately.
2. Engage patients to come in for preventive and wellness visits. When members have regular visits, providers can diagnose and document health conditions.
   
   However, this is easier said than done. Patients may not understand their health benefits, have the means to get to their visits, are not physically able to leave their home or are afraid to go to the doctor. Providing education about their health conditions and health benefits may contribute to better engagement and health outcomes.
3. Review charts to be sure providers identify all health conditions and that staff codes and submits all conditions correctly. Complete and accurate information helps states compare and assess all risk scores for health plans providing health coverage in Medicaid markets.

Are those three actions that important given Medicaid’s zero-sum-game?

They are. Closing gaps in care is the main goal of an effective risk adjustment program and that may help create a positive impact all around. Patient health care outcomes may improve as may risk scores. When your risk scores improve, your bottom line may improve.

Work with a partner that:

• Has experience working with state Medicaid requirements
• Can help you improve provider and member engagement efforts
• Has the analytic capabilities to do targeted chart reviews to find open gaps or look for conditions that were diagnosed but not coded

Want to know more?

Establish best practices for Medicaid risk adjustment that may improve accuracy. Learn about what to do and when to do it.

Complete the form above to download the whitepaper.